| Digitoday Mobile Uutiskirje digitoday Uutisvinkit Mediakortti Uutisotsikot omalle sivulle RSS | |||||||
![]() |
Arkisto: OS Blog in EnglishInterview with Peter Cheng, CEO of TargetSource- Mikko Puhakka *Disclosure: I am an advisor to TargetSource see: TargetSource Official Launch 1. How did you get started? After 7 years effort on open source community and 3 years business practice on open source services in China, we think it is a right time for us to start up TargetSource. More and more companies always ask us to help them to solve problems when they use open source, sometime if you are just a individual, it is not a long term strategy for company to get support on open source software. That’s why we started TargetSouce, an open source service company which delivers to end customers by a global collaboration network with partners base on the open source software. 2. What is your product? TargetSource strategy is not building a single open source component or product such as JBoss, hibernate, Spring or so. From our point view, our customer requirement is a solution, which can help them solve their technology problem and optimize their business. So, TargetSource has developed the Enterprise-Ready Open Source™ Platform to enable these powerful new open source-based solutions. For each solution, TargetSource selects the right components, and then integrates, builds, tests and packages them to create stacks that are optimized for that solution. 3. Key milestones? In the next coming 5 years , there will be three key milestones for TargetSource 1) 2008, startup year for core team building, spread enterprise-ready open source strategy to China, and enable more business and technology partner to use enterprise-ready open source software. At the same time , establish the partnership with open source companies such as Redhat, SUN Microsystem, SpringSource, MuleSource, IONA and so forth. Begin to build a good open source ecosystem in China. 2) 2011, with 3 years growth, TargetSource will growth fast and establish his capacity and position on open source services market in China, It will enter into a faster growth period. 3) 2013, TargetSource will become the NO.1 open source service company in China, whenever an company wants to use open source software , he should call TargetSource for help. 4. Why did you decide on the open source model? Open source is already beyond the source code, it’s about process, the way on how to build good software; it’s about community, the way to let more people to share their ideas together; it’s about methodlogy, the way on how we think about software. Out vision is to build good software and let more enterprise to use it with the right way without lock into commercial software,give people the freedom to use software. Open Source is the right choice to make all this happen. 5. How do you see TargetSource in 5 years? As I have metioned in the key milestones , TargetSource will growth fast in the next coming 5 years, we will provide more opportunity for smarter people who work on open source , we will hire those people from the community also contribute on open source in the community. TargetSource will be a community driven company, the one important think for us to do is to enable more open source community in China, right now , it’s important to breed community soil in China, then you will gain in the next coming 5 years. TargetSource will become an very important company of China software industry also be an important role in the open source world. 6. Some comments on Open Source and China After running more than 7 years open source community in China, there are really so many things I can talk about open source in China, but the first thing I want to say that open source in China is just at the early age, there is still need to learn more about the open source community management methodology, how to adopt open source software into your software, how to share and exchange ideas between different kinds of community. The second is about education, if we want to make open source success in China also around the world, we need to let more student to learn and participate the open source, if you know it, maybe you will use, then you will participate. That’s why I started the Open Source University program to give lectures around 100 universities in China. Language is culture , If you want to do business well in China, the first thing is to learn Chinese, find the best local people with international experience and ability to collaboration with you. Finally, I think Open Source will be the best way to make China software industry become stronger. Joining A Chinese Open Source Company’s Advisory Board- Mikko Puhakka People reading this blog & friends have certainly noted my excitement about China in the last year. Therefore I am pleased to disclose that I have been invited and I have joined advisory board of TargetSource, a newly formed Open Source company based in Beijing. For more info see TargetSource Official Launch I will soon interview Peter Cheng, the founder of the company, to share some of his ideas and vision for building Open Source business out of China. Joining Continuent Advisory Board (updated March 3rd)- Mikko Puhakka Earlier this week at OSBC in San Francisco a new advisory board was announced for Continuent, the leading provider of commercial open source middleware solutions for database high-availability and scalability. I feel priviledged to be able to be part of this group: Tim Golden, Senior Vice-President, Bank of America. Tim has 20 years IT management experience designing and implementing major infrastructure projects, both as a consultant working for IBM® and currently as a senior vice president at Bank of America working exclusively with Linux® and open source software technologies. He was also named as one of the 15 most influential open source business people recently by eweek story here Douglas S. Tracy, the EVP for IT (North America) and Chief Technology Officer, Global IT, Rolls-Royce. Doug has over 25 years of management experience in the private and public sector. In this role, he is responsible for supporting the IT needs of 8,000 employees in Rolls-Royce North America, a $4B subsidiary of Rolls-Royce plc. In addition, he is responsible globally for defining the medium and long range IT strategies for Rolls-Royce plc, a $15B and 40,000 employee organization that develops power solutions and services. As CTO, Doug determines the technical architecture upon which the IT environment of the future will converge and authorizes new investments in information technology solutions. Barry Klawans. Barry was founder and CTO at Jaspersoft™ and responsible for the technical vision and direction. He has over 20 years of experience architecting and developing enterprise applications. Prior to JasperSoft, Barry was the Systems Architect at Bidcom, one of the original engineers at Remedy, and an early engineer at Sybase®, where he spent five years of development effort on the core server and network access layer. Zak Greant, Electronic Frontier Strategist. Zak owns and operates Foo Associates, a strategic consultancy that helps companies adapt to and thrive on the Internet. Their clients include eZ Systems AS and the Mozilla® Foundation. Zak is an active participant in many free and open source communities, offering advice to groups like the Free Software Foundation and the Open Source Initiative. Mikko Puhakka, Consultant and Researcher. Mikko is an open source consultant and a researcher at Helsinki University of Technology. He founded Holtron Ventures in 1999 and was an early investor in MySQL®. He is a founder of Open Tuesday in Finland. Stephen Walli, Consultant. Stephen was vice president of R&D and founder at Softway Systems before being acquired by Microsoft®. Currently he consults on software business strategy. To read the whole pressrelease pls see: here I have also written about Continuent before, see e.g here Acceleration of Open Source Software Deployment in China- Mikko Puhakka I have previously written couple of posts about OSS and China. You can find the posts here and here . Now, however I have undertaken a challenge to take the understanding of the emerging opportunities for entrepreneurs and investors in the OSS space in China to the next level. In January Technology Agency of Finland, TEKES and Ministry of Science and Technology from China discussed about undertaking a study tentatively titled Acceleration of Open Source Software Deployment in China, later Linux Foundation also promised its support. Press release of the undertaking can be found from here . The report will be made freely available both in English and Chinese targeting June release. The work is quite challenging so I am grateful for all comments and advice as to what are the issues that should be addressed. I will be in San Francisco during OSBC March 25-26th and in Beijing the week starting April 7th to discuss these issues face to face with anyone interested in the topic and possibly willing to contribute to the work all contributions included in the released work will of course be credited to the originators. To get a better idea of the work please see the current outline below. You are welcome to comment on this blog or e-mail me directly mikko.puhakka (at) gmail.com Structure of the report (draft 0.1) 1. Introduction 1.1 Global trends in Open Source software deployment 2.0 Key Areas of Opportunity (Each topic has three aspects): 2.1 OSS Based Business Enablers Purpose of this section is to outline some of the key areas where commonly used enabling technologies would significantly increase effectiveness while implementing solutions for future information society. It would not be a comprehensive “to-do” list, but rather a business and academic view of these key areas. 2.1.1 Protocols, tools, frameworks and engines 2.2.2 Platforms, gateways and horizontal products 2.3.3 Security (e.g. Authentication, Transactional security like in e-commerce solutions) 2.2 Software Driven Consumer and Business Services (applications) Purpose of this section is to outline some of the key business areas where new value can be developed and created, in China but also globally. Especially areas in mobile communications, web business models for consumers, governmental and business-to-business are of interest. New IPR creation will have more emphasize on this section. As an outcome, this section will highlight not necessary detailed applications or services but rather a view of potential development directions and opportunity spaces (like wellbeing, environmental measurement solutions, social networks etc…). 2.2.1 E-services 2.0 infrastructure for governmental services (e.g. online tax services or other services for citizens, in Finland for instance Ministry of Labors’ registry of citizens and employment services) 3.0 Some Other Key Issues - Educational aspects through University collaboration? 4.0 Public Sector and its Role in China - A ‘’mind map’’ explaining the relationships and roles of various public organizations 5.0 Conclusions and Recommendations 6.0 References After MySQL Exit – What Next?- Mikko Puhakka The biggest open source news so far this year has been that MySQL was bought by Sun Microsystems for a Billion dollars (disclaimer: I was a seed investor in to MySQL). For good analysis check e.g. Stephen O’Grady’s post as well as Stephen Walli’s thougths and for the inside scoop in Jonathan’s post and Zack Urlocker’s post about the process. Some reactions have surprised me a quite a bit. I have received questions and comments such as that ‘’we lost yet another European high-tech company to the US’’, ‘’does this destroy the promise of open source as MySQL becomes part of this big public company?’’ I would accept the first comment if the company had been sold under priced, but we did not lose MySQL, we SOLD it for 1 BILLION dollars! This was great news for the Nordic start-up community and especially open source start-up community: a role model and a strong message to the investment community that we can both build great companies in the open source space and we know how to deliver value to the investors. Now it is time to take the lessons learnt from that case as well as use it as a reference to build the next cases, and I believe we are well on our way. Just consider the following: right before the news about MySQL/SUN deal, Fortune listed the most expected IPO candidates for 2008, 3 out of 7 were open source companies. Deloitte Touche listed the 10 fastest growing companies out of Finland, that included 2 open source companies, with the top spot going to open source company Nomovok. Helsingin Sanomat had experts vote the most promising growth companies out of Finland, 3 out of 10 were open source companies. In other words there is much more to come and now it is a great time to do it. I certainly believe there is a bright future for open source and open source driven businesses and I am currently working on with several of them internationally, some that I have already covered in this blog like Ebox out of Spain , or Continuent , which is currently particularly interesting as it is a MySQL partner and we need to see how the SUN deal impacts ISVs like Continuent in the evolving database ecosystem as it is a MySQL partner (and also supports PostgreSQL, in which SUN had invested already earlier). Something that today’s young entrepreneurs should note about MySQL, it took 12 years to build the business, there are always some exceptions like YouTube where the cashing out happens very quickly, but I would suggest that the timeframe MySQL had is more realistic as a model. Kevin Harvey said that Benchmark was considered insane to make the investment already back in 2003, what that does make my investment company’s Holtron Ventures team for making the initial investment in 2001? Were/are we stark raving mad? I don’t believe so; I just believe there should be more venture attitude in venture capital than there currently is in Nordics and Europe to build the next MySQL type success stories. I want to end this post with a quote from Mårten Mickos, CEO of MySQL, which well explains type of things an early investor needs to do and what kind of value they can bring by being insane or mad enough: ‘’Holtron played a pivotal role in the commercial growth of MySQL by being the first VC in early 2001 to present a term sheet. This contributed to ‘’Going Open’’ – Why & How? Part 1/2- Mikko Puhakka There is a going trend among companies not just supporting and appreciating open source, but also ‘’going open’’ by releasing their new development efforts as open source or converting their formerly proprietary offerings open source by releasing the source code under some open source license such as GPL. I believe there are many misconceptions among organizations as to what can be gained by this and even more misconceptions as to how to manage the process. Some Myths: - Open Source is hostile to intellectual property. (Free/Libre Open Source Software: a guide for SMEs 2007) Some reasons why select companies are making the move: SUN Microsystems wanted, according to CEO Jonathan Schwartz in a Matt Asay interview, move to open source development and distribution strategy because: ‘’Early on at Sun I ran our developer tools business. There’s no clearer place than that to see that if you don’t drive adoption you won’t get revenue. Most don’t care about the license–they care about the money they’re not spending. (Think about how bizarre Google’s model would be if they charge 10 cents for every search.) But those students and free users of today are the corporate buyers of tomorrow.’’ CONTINUENT aimed at an offensive and defensive move. Offensive in terms expanding market reach, defensive in term of taking control of open source project which could have become a competitive thread if let develop freely on its own. Continuent used to have proprietary clustering for open source (m/cluster classic for MySQL). They acquired rights for Sequoia open source project (www.continuent.org), formerly know as C-JDBC on Object Web) speeding up the project development as well as making it more manageable from business perspective by dedicating some in-house resources and that enabled them to expand product offering beyond MySQL, initially including also PostgreSQL and then subsequently added also support for commercial databases (Oracle, SQL Server, Sybase, DB2). As a part of this process they opened or kept open some 90% of the code base and then create commercial value-add layer based on knowledge on specific databases. And some results: SUN according to Schwartz: ‘’In a year where Sun arguably moved more aggressively to give away more free software than any other company, we grew our software business by 13 percent. It was the fastest-growing business at Sun (and doesn’t even include Solaris, which we don’t yet break out). We pumped out more software last year than we have in the history of the company. We gave it away. And yet our software business grew by 13 percent. How? If you’re a London developer that happens to work for a bank, maybe you have your laptop set up with Ubuntu. It’s perfect for you, and it’s free as in beer. But if you’re the CIO at that same company, you’re going to demand a support contract for Ubuntu (or Solaris) running on your mission-critical servers, because you don’t want the risk of systems going down without backup. I don’t expect many college students, developers, or start-ups to spend a lot of money on intellectual property. I expect someone whose job is on the line if a system fails to spend considerably more than nothing. The key is figuring out the difference between one’s market and one’s community. They are not the same.'’ Continuent with open source solution, according to the CEO Eero Teerikorpi, the approach has enabled us to move into subscription pricing and allowed us to significantly increase the services sale revenue. The marketing cost has definitely come down, but the sales cost has also come down, although that is expected to go back normal level when we move from early adopters to normal sales cycles. For further insights I encourage you to look into the materials we published in the OSSI-project (available for free as pdf-downloads) Disclaimer: Sun has funded some of my research and Continuent is a client of mine Part 2/2 of this post will include some key things to consider when going open such as: - Core vs. context Open Innovation and Open Source- Mikko Puhakka I am heading back to Zaragoza to speak and attend at the 2nd Open Innovation event on the 20th, and I certainly am excited about it for a number of reasons, not least because of the great entrepreneurship the country currently is providing. Secondly Spain seems to have disproportionate amount of open source developers compared to many other countries. I don’t quite understand the reason for this, but I hope to find out, as well as very thriving entrepreneurship scene as Ignacio has already noted and good number of young Open Source businesses as Stephen has commented on. I am looking forward to talking to as many of them as possible. Disclaimer: I am on the board of Ebox & have been involved in setting the event up Part II Emergence of Open Source within Chinese Software Industry- Mikko Puhakka There has been quite a bit of talk about emergence of Open Source in China, but the numbers are still very small, as they are for the overall software industry, highlighted by the numbers with Linux (smaller yet for other OSS). ‘’Linux has been riding on a wave in China, topping the growth of all operating systems in the first quarter of 2007, says an industry analyst. According to CCID Consulting, which specializes in China research, Linux sales posted a 30.9 percent year-on-year growth to reach 31 million yuan (US$4 million). Windows and Unix growth rates were 11.6 percent and 9.6 percent, respectively.’’ ‘’Q1 market share Linux (2.5 percent), Windows (41.8 percent), Unix (53.9 percent)’’ More in a ZDNet Asia article Some key issues to consider in my view are: 1) Microsoft still has huge resources that enable them to have their way in most markets, including China if allowed But to continue with the questions I started with JingJing in the first part of this series Part 1 here is further Q&A Q1 Name some key milestones in Chinese Open Source history (translation of the key Chinese open source history, Source ) The origin of the Chinese open source activities can be dated back in the beginning of 1990s, when Dr. Gong Ming was working on his PhD research topic on parallel processing in Helsinki University of Technology in Finland. He discovered Linux operating system from an educational network in 1991 and later on started deployment and development on it. The major movement related to China when: - in 1996, Dr. Gong Min brought the Linux operating system within 20 discs back to China. Q2 What are some key efforts around Open Source right now? The Chinese government has been putting lots of effort in encouraging open source development. Policies like “No. 18 Document” and “No. 47 Document” were issued for promoting open source. They not only contain the government good wish, but also practical support like from taxation, finance, purchase, import and export… Linux development started since the beginning of 2000, and comprises a huge part of open source development in China. When people talk about open source nowadays, many people will right away associate the discussion to Linux. Based on CCW Research, Linux software market sales reached 570 million Yuan in 2003, and 750 million in 2004 with 32% growth. Amongst which, the server-side product sales was 623.2 million Yuan, and desktop sales – 126.8 million Yuan. Till 2005, the top three players in the market are TurboLinux[1], Red Flag Software[2], and China Standard Software[3]. Though the Linux development has been around 30% increase within the recent years, still the utilization rate is rather low. Besides the known usability issue, one of the root problems is software piracy. Microsoft got 95% of the market in the Chinese market thanks to that since the mid 1990s. And it is hard for Linux to make its entry as the market is already dominated by Microsoft. Even Bill Gates said that “It’s easier for our software to compete with Linux when there’s piracy than when there’s not”. On the other hand, the competition in the Linux market is becoming fierce. Microsoft started offering $3 Windows XP to developing countries’ governments and educations. Chinese Linux vendors are currently focusing on government and small to medium sized enterprise market. In order to gain market shares, the market research suggested industry cooperation and business acquisition to be a business strategy to carry out for the domestic Linux vendors. After year 2004, the concept of open source got wider spread in China. This also thanks to the many successful commercializations of open source software globally. However, understanding of open source is still relatively fresh in China. in many cases, it could be incorrect, subjective or incomplete. However, as open source is a new development direction in the software industry, many open source companies received venture capital investment and started their development. Most of them are trying to copying the existing business models from the west. However revenue generation still remains a reluctant topic for them to discuss. There are a few successful example only. One is Discuz, a Chinese open source discussion platform. Currently there are over 30,000 discussion forums using its product all over the world. Otherwise companies like Hoodong, Huihoo have also been relatively successful in its development. IT people in China do realize the benefits of open source, yet the Chinese market is special and immature, finding out the right path for commercialization may take still several years. Foreign companies have been looking into the Chinese market for new opportunities. Companies like MySQL, RedHat, Mozilla, Novell, Oracle, Ubuntu, etc have all been establishing business in China. [1] TurboLinux is an open source software company focusing on offering enterprise software solutions, and support service based on Linux. It is founded in the US in the early 1990s and entered the Chinese market in 1999. www.turbolinux.com.cn Q3. What are your key thoughts on the state of the China’s Open Source a) today, and b) how does the future look? The Chinese open source is still very young nowadays, and this situation will not change rapidly. There are many reasons behind: Despite of the problem mentioned above, I see a very promising Chinese market for open source. According to our Chinese philosophy, in order to win or succeed, time, location and people are the 3 key factors; however the most important among these three is people. At the moment, the time has come for the open source to expand in China. The huge Chinese market is attractive; thus the location is not bad for open source. However the Chinese market is lacking huge number of open source professionals. And this situation cannot be changed easily without serious effort. In order to succeed in the Chinese market, raising up a huge open source audience by introducing the open source concepts, business models, legal issues, community management as well as technical knowledge is essential. In addition, the Chinese market is fulled with varieties and dimensions. Open source comparing to proprietary software has the advantage on pricing. Based on the current Chinese market, there are a lot of potentials in all industries to compete with proprietary software, especially in the small, medium sized enterprise market, the education sector, regions and provinces under average development. China and (Open Source) Software – Part 1 The Software Industry- Mikko Puhakka China is becoming more and more important as a market for software; both proprietary and open source software. Still knowledge as to what is really taking place is quite limited with both language and cultural barriers making it difficult to understand for many westerners at least, to what is the Chinese opportunity for software developers and vendors globally. Some good coverage in the last year from the blogspace can be found e.g. from especially Stephen Walli , but also from Amy Jiang of Canonical/Ubuntu , Zack Urlocher of MySQL and Matt Asay of Alfresco . However, this is only a beginning and things are moving very rapidly and it is important to understand things deeper. At Helsinki University of Technology Software Business and Engineering Institute , together with select partners we are looking to understand this better as well. As part of that work I have been instructing JingJing Helles on her Master’s Thesis that is taking a good look at some of the issues, it certainly helps that she is from China and a native Chinese speaker. We decided to write few blogs on the topic before her thesis is out, to get some feedback as well as some ideas if certain areas should have more emphasis. But to get started I wanted to ask JingJing few questions: Q1. Tell briefly about your background and interest in software business I have been working in the software industry in Finland since 2002. I first started as a research assistant on mobile services in Nokia Research Center while studying for my bachelor degree on software engineering. After finishing my bachelor, I became a software engineer working in the industry while continuing a further master degree study at Helsinki University of Technology on software business and engineering. I have been a software designer, software tester, test manager, and now a quality assurance consultant throughout these years. Software business has always been of interest to me. In 2004, I started looking into open source software business through a course assignment in the university. The more I read and talk with people about it, the more attractive it appears to me. I was lucky to get the opportunity to work with you Mikko (I believe I was the lucky one) since the beginning of 2007 in research studies on open source software business in China. The result of my research will be presented in my master thesis work. I like the idea of “openness” - open mindset, open development, open source and open competition. I have a strong believe in the future of open source. The software market in China is still very young yet growing intensively on yearly basis. The combination of open source and Chinese software market could provide true social and economy values to the development in China. Q2. Please give a brief overview of the Chinese Software industry e.g. size, growth-rate, special areas of interest I see the Chinese software market to be very attractive. In 2004, the market size was about 53.9 billion Yuan (5.2 billion euro). From Jan-May 2007, the software market reached 178.3 billion euros sales revenue. Though the current market size is still rather small, comprising 6% of the global market, one has to take into consideration that software industry was almost non-existing 15 years ago in China. Within the last decade, the Chinese software market has been growing through fast development and restructuring with around 30% growth rate annually. With the ever increasing internal interests and international focus on China, the Chinese government estimates a staggering growth reaching 4800 billion Yuan sales (463 billion euros), with 4.4 billion euro export and outsourcing, and 1.29 million professionals till 2010. Some special areas of interests: Enterprise software market has been showing steady growth in the recent years, as more and more companies have come to realize the values that enterprise software could provide. Additionally, it has been predicted that the rapid growth in Internet use will further drive the demand for software that accommodates broadband services, such as multimedia compatible software that will enable users to enjoy broadband contents. Blog hosting and multimedia content sharing, similar to MySpace and Youtube, have been the hot investment spots in the recent years. Q3. Are there any special characteristics as to how the Chinese software market works that you want to highlight? The Chinese market does have some interesting characteristics: The Chinese software industry is still very young and small comparing to the global market. The development of the software industry is far behind, and not in proportion compared to the hardware industry. The difference between enterprise market and consumer market is huge (96.62% vs. 3.38% in 2004). The Chinese government, telecommunication, education, banking and production have been the key places of investments into IT in 2004. Software piracy remains a big problem in the Chinese market. The situation in the consumer market will gradually improve as the campaign on fighting software piracy continues in China. As the Chinese market in general is still immature, the Chinese government has been taking actions to protect and support the local Chinese companies against competitions from global players. This can appear in many forms - Chinese own standards, favoring domestic software products, regulations, etc. Foreign companies coming to the Chinese market must be aware of these issues before their entry. Some additional comments on software piracy in China: Microsoft has been complaining about it since its entry to the Chinese market. Actually comparing to Microsoft, I think it is the whole Chinese domestic software industry that has suffered the most. And that is one of the reasons which causes the Chinese market to be still very immature and hinders a healthy growth through time. Q4. How have the Chinese traditionally worked with foreign software vendors, do you see any emerging trends? The most common means for foreign software vendors working in the Chinese market is to: - buy Chinese companies, The Chinese market has been very attractive and many foreign companies are looking into the Chinese market for opportunities. They have advanced technology and wonderful business models, but lack of real experience with the local environment of the industry and the market information. To get an initial understanding, many companies have started their piloting operation in China through partnership with local Chinese companies in localization, further development and marketing operations. Q5. Do you see any big challenges in Chinese software industry that the companies and organizations from abroad could help to solve together with Chinese? I see two issues here: 1) The Chinese software industry has lots of good programmers produced by the Chinese academy annually. But at the moment, the market is really in need of experienced IT professionals with various management skills in areas such as project, quality, process, IPR and business. The resource defines the capability of the market. In order to build up a better environment for further development, education, training and knowledge transfer could be a direction where foreign companies can bring extensive knowledge and experiences to the Chinese market. 2) Though China has good programmers, comparing to the foreign companies there is a lack of real technical and domain knowledge and experience. At the moment, in those international companies most of the complex R&D work is done abroad. Chinese subsidiaries are normally working on localization and marketing issues. One key reason I see is that the foreign companies are afraid of losing their IPRs. However, to build up the Chinese software industry, China needs to strengthen its R&D capability. I have been wondering - is there a possibility that foreign companies can gradually provide technology transfer to the Chinese market? Part II will be looking at the Emergence of Open Source within Chinese software industry. Finding the Way to the Customer – Case Continuent- Mikko Puhakka Matt Asay recently interviewed Eero Teerikorpi, CEO of Continuent in his Open Source CEO series and despite of the great interview, I wanted to take it a step further and asked Eero elaborate on some issues. In one way this is also a continuation of my Open Source Business Meme from some weeks ago. Some key advice Eero pointed out in the article was the importance of partners and channels: ‘’Another surprise is partner networking, or actually the lack of it. Maybe this is result of open source companies’ natural tendency to focus on services and, for the most part, on a direct sales model. Open source companies have created tight-knit partner communities, which are excellent vehicles for the self-promoting (every self-respecting open source company seems to be partner with at least 10 other open source companies), while at the same time there has been very limited success in creating truly significant partner networks (system integrators, VARs) to push open source solutions to the end users….’’ ‘’ Focus on partners, partners that sell for you. Strategic partners are great to increase credibility, but won’t pay your bills. Peer partners are great to increase overall visibility, but won’t pay your bills. Partners who will deliver your solution to the paying customer are a godsend - they pay your bills. Understand what motivates partners, and keep them happy and productive!’’ I am 100% behind that piece of advice, but while agreeing that is the way to go, the big question for me (and I suppose for many entrepreneurs) is how? How to execute the sound strategy and identify and actually get those key partners critical for your business success or even survival? Continuent has gone through couple of phases 1) under the name Emic Networks with more traditional proprietary approach and 2) under the current name Continuent changing the approach to Open Source. Q1. How has your company’s partnering strategy changed while moving from a proprietary to open source model? Have you had to dismiss some earlier partners’ as they did not fit the new approach? A1. Over the course of the years there have been natural ‘churn rate’ among channel partners for number of reasons, but we did not have to make major overhaul of the partner network. As a part of the change from completely proprietary solution to the commercial open source we have kept the licensing, pricing and partner discounts very attractive. There was more significant change in our channel-strategy when we expanded database support from MySQL-only solution (which was the case with our proprietary solution) to also cover PostgreSQL and EnterpriseDB. MySQL’s adoption rate is clearly larger than any other open source databases, but interestingly enough due MySQL’s own quite aggressive direct sales approach and primary focus in embedded market, MySQL has not developed extensive network of resellers or systems integrators. There is no one single company behind PostgreSQL. That has created more opportunities for local system integrators and there seems to be more partner opportunities for value-add providers such Continuent. Majority of our sales go through channel partners. Continuent uni/cluster was developed to be very ‘channel friendly’ solution: it is easy to install and support, it is great value-add, there is plenty margin for resellers (typical uni/cluster installation is between 30,000-60,000 USD) and there is also additional consulting opportunities (performance tuning, etc.) for knowledgeable partners. Q2. Any special challenges in building the business out of Finland? A2. When Continuent was established in Finland, our mindset was from the day one to be ‘born-global’. It naturally did help us that my primary residence has been US for the past 14 years and I have been involved with cross-Atlantic software business this whole time. Finland has definitely significant good-will value and healthy respect within open source community with number of visible open source visionaries and leaders, for example Linus and Mårten, coming out of Finland. This creates a good ground to build successful open source companies. The key challenge with Finland, and almost any European based companies, is the lack of the understanding in customers actual needs (largest open source customers are in USA, and their needs are not always same as smaller European based customers) and effectively getting solutions to the market. There always is very good and solid technical foundation, but there seems to be disconnection what actual customer needs are and how to take those into account in the process creating solutions out of these core technologies. As valuable the open source community is giving feedback, unfortunately you can’t solely trust the judgment of the masses. The key decisions need to be done internally, and those need to be based on solid market intelligence and true understanding of the customer needs. Q3.Please outline a short description as to how to do it e.g. 3 do’s and 3 don’ts A3. The three DO’s for the aspiring open source entrepreneurs from Finland, or from Europe in general: i) Make sure that you solution qualifies for the open source model. Danny Rimer’s three Cs (community, commodity, cushion) should help ii) Follow Steve Job’s lead and build ‘insanely great’ solutions. ‘Me too’ just doesn’t cut it. ‘Good enough’ won’t create excitement. iii) Think hard who can be the best partners to take your solution to the market. The larger partner the better, but early on you need to settle smaller partners until you have increase your credibility. And Don’ts: i) Don’t forget to define your ideal customers (note: first customers may not be ideal on the long run, thus you really need to define the ideal customer). You need to address a real need of this ideal customer. You also need to offer a complete solution. Don’t assume that all customers are alike. USA customers tend to build larger systems catering larger markets, thus they typically require more (quality, functionality, supportability), but this will also help your smaller customers. ii) Don’t forget your community: as you give to your community, it is fair to expect real value (contribution, testing, support) back. Community will be your best marketing vehicle and also excellent source to recruit new talent. iii) Don’t forget that your solution and market takes time to mature. Make sure you have adequate funding to ride the tough times, which there will be plenty. You can safely assume that you are in the business for a long haul, minimum 5-7 years, before you can see any significant success. For example MySQL has been around almost 15 years (taking account Monty’s early years) and it took first 7 years (10 if you count the early years) to reach 5 Million euro revenue. |
|
|||||
digitoday.fi, Töölönlahdenkatu 2, 00089 Sanomat. Puhelin +358 9 1221, faksi +358 9 122 4179 Päätoimittaja: Juhani Pekkala, toimituspäällikkö Mari Flink Myynti: verkkomedia.myynti@sanoma.fi, +358 9 122 2863. Sähköposti: toimitus@digitoday.fi Copyright 2006 Taloussanomat Oy. Our Privacy Policy |
|
||||||