Digitoday Mobile • Uutiskirje • digitoday • Uutisvinkit • Mediakortti • Uutisotsikot omalle sivulle • RSS

   etusivuetusivu
   kaikki uutiset

   datadata
   finanssifinanssi
   mediamedia
   teletele

   työ & uratyö & ura
   tietoturvatietoturva
   it-myyntiit-myynti
   tuotteet ja palveluttuotteet ja palvelut
   kolumnitkolumnit
   taloussanomat - pörssikurssitpörssit

   blogitblogit
   videotvideot

   faktafakta

   shopshop

Hae








5.3.2008

Acceleration of Open Source Software Deployment in China

- Mikko Puhakka

I have previously written couple of posts about OSS and China. You can find the posts here and here .

Now, however I have undertaken a challenge to take the understanding of the emerging opportunities for entrepreneurs and investors in the OSS space in China to the next level.

In January Technology Agency of Finland, TEKES and Ministry of Science and Technology from China discussed about undertaking a study tentatively titled Acceleration of Open Source Software Deployment in China, later Linux Foundation also promised its support. Press release of the undertaking can be found from here .

The report will be made freely available both in English and Chinese targeting June release.

The work is quite challenging so I am grateful for all comments and advice as to what are the issues that should be addressed.

I will be in San Francisco during OSBC March 25-26th and in Beijing the week starting April 7th to discuss these issues face to face with anyone interested in the topic and possibly willing to contribute to the work all contributions included in the released work will of course be credited to the originators.

To get a better idea of the work please see the current outline below.

You are welcome to comment on this blog or e-mail me directly mikko.puhakka (at) gmail.com

Structure of the report (draft 0.1)

1. Introduction

1.1 Global trends in Open Source software deployment
1.2 Trends in Open Source software deployment in China including market size
1.3 Global Open Source communities vs. Chinese Open Source communities
1.4 Key Open Source business models with brief case examples
1.5 Fit of the key Open Source business models to Chinese market

2.0 Key Areas of Opportunity (Each topic has three aspects):
1) Technical
2) Market and business
3) Relevance and interface to China national technology programs:
• MOST 863, Torch Program, other key projects and software needs of China, and possible open source based solutions):

2.1 OSS Based Business Enablers
(Significant existing value gardens where redistribution of value is favored):

Purpose of this section is to outline some of the key areas where commonly used enabling technologies would significantly increase effectiveness while implementing solutions for future information society. It would not be a comprehensive “to-do” list, but rather a business and academic view of these key areas.

2.1.1 Protocols, tools, frameworks and engines
• Protocols, which are commonly used in IP world or on top of Internet Protocol stack (like authentication protocols, potentially peer-to-peer protocols that could be used in China etc)
• Commonly used Engines like, map engine, e-commerce engine etc.
• Product development tools or frameworks that could potentially provide additional value to Chinese market (different coding logic and understanding nuances of Chinese language etc)

2.2.2 Platforms, gateways and horizontal products
• E.g. operating systems such as Linux or products such as OpenOffice and e-commerce platforms
• Gateway (or protocol transcoding) which are commonly used

2.3.3 Security (e.g. Authentication, Transactional security like in e-commerce solutions)
2.3.4 Training and consulting
• How to create mechanisms to train efficiently people / organizations to take most out of the OSS based innovations and development
• How to link global software development and project management best practices into reality (University, public and private sector)

2.2 Software Driven Consumer and Business Services (applications)
(Opportunity spaces where new value can be developed):

Purpose of this section is to outline some of the key business areas where new value can be developed and created, in China but also globally. Especially areas in mobile communications, web business models for consumers, governmental and business-to-business are of interest.

New IPR creation will have more emphasize on this section.

As an outcome, this section will highlight not necessary detailed applications or services but rather a view of potential development directions and opportunity spaces (like wellbeing, environmental measurement solutions, social networks etc…).

2.2.1 E-services 2.0 infrastructure for governmental services (e.g. online tax services or other services for citizens, in Finland for instance Ministry of Labors’ registry of citizens and employment services)
2.2.2 Consumer 2.0 services (e.g. Amazon’s e-commerce)
2.2.3 On-demand business services (e.g. Salesforce.com service delivered as SAAS)

3.0 Some Other Key Issues

- Educational aspects through University collaboration?
- Best practices for OSS based software development, quality assurance and testing
- Knowledge transfer?
- Joint venture Company model based on Finnish/international business template?
- Consulting and training opportunities for agile companies?
- Mobile communication and related OSS areas as a separate item!

4.0 Public Sector and its Role in China

- A ‘’mind map’’ explaining the relationships and roles of various public organizations

5.0 Conclusions and Recommendations

6.0 References

Julkaistu 11:24  /  Kommentoi

28.1.2008

After MySQL Exit – What Next?

- Mikko Puhakka

The biggest open source news so far this year has been that MySQL was bought by Sun Microsystems for a Billion dollars (disclaimer: I was a seed investor in to MySQL). For good analysis check e.g. Stephen O’Grady’s post as well as Stephen Walli’s thougths and for the inside scoop in Jonathan’s post and Zack Urlocker’s post about the process.

Some reactions have surprised me a quite a bit. I have received questions and comments such as that ‘’we lost yet another European high-tech company to the US’’, ‘’does this destroy the promise of open source as MySQL becomes part of this big public company?’’

I would accept the first comment if the company had been sold under priced, but we did not lose MySQL, we SOLD it for 1 BILLION dollars!

This was great news for the Nordic start-up community and especially open source start-up community: a role model and a strong message to the investment community that we can both build great companies in the open source space and we know how to deliver value to the investors.

Now it is time to take the lessons learnt from that case as well as use it as a reference to build the next cases, and I believe we are well on our way.

Just consider the following: right before the news about MySQL/SUN deal, Fortune listed the most expected IPO candidates for 2008, 3 out of 7 were open source companies. Deloitte Touche listed the 10 fastest growing companies out of Finland, that included 2 open source companies, with the top spot going to open source company Nomovok. Helsingin Sanomat had experts vote the most promising growth companies out of Finland, 3 out of 10 were open source companies. In other words there is much more to come and now it is a great time to do it.

I certainly believe there is a bright future for open source and open source driven businesses and I am currently working on with several of them internationally, some that I have already covered in this blog like Ebox out of Spain , or Continuent , which is currently particularly interesting as it is a MySQL partner and we need to see how the SUN deal impacts ISVs like Continuent in the evolving database ecosystem as it is a MySQL partner (and also supports PostgreSQL, in which SUN had invested already earlier).

Something that today’s young entrepreneurs should note about MySQL, it took 12 years to build the business, there are always some exceptions like YouTube where the cashing out happens very quickly, but I would suggest that the timeframe MySQL had is more realistic as a model.

Kevin Harvey said that Benchmark was considered insane to make the investment already back in 2003, what that does make my investment company’s Holtron Ventures team for making the initial investment in 2001? Were/are we stark raving mad? I don’t believe so; I just believe there should be more venture attitude in venture capital than there currently is in Nordics and Europe to build the next MySQL type success stories.

I want to end this post with a quote from Mårten Mickos, CEO of MySQL, which well explains type of things an early investor needs to do and what kind of value they can bring by being insane or mad enough:

‘’Holtron played a pivotal role in the commercial growth of MySQL by being the first VC in early 2001 to present a term sheet. This contributed to
bringing other investors on board, and it also helped me make the decision to join MySQL and not take the other CEO position I was being offered at the time.’’

Julkaistu 06:41  /  Kommentoi

16.12.2007

‘’Going Open’’ – Why & How? Part 1/2

- Mikko Puhakka

There is a going trend among companies not just supporting and appreciating open source, but also ‘’going open’’ by releasing their new development efforts as open source or converting their formerly proprietary offerings open source by releasing the source code under some open source license such as GPL.

I believe there are many misconceptions among organizations as to what can be gained by this and even more misconceptions as to how to manage the process.

Some Myths:

- Open Source is hostile to intellectual property.
- If I give away my software to the Open Source community, thousands of developers will suddenly start working for me for nothing.
- The Open Source movement isn’t sustainable, since people will stop developing free software once they see others making lots of money from their efforts.

(Free/Libre Open Source Software: a guide for SMEs 2007)

Some reasons why select companies are making the move:

SUN Microsystems wanted, according to CEO Jonathan Schwartz in a Matt Asay interview, move to open source development and distribution strategy because:

‘’Early on at Sun I ran our developer tools business. There’s no clearer place than that to see that if you don’t drive adoption you won’t get revenue.
But not from the developer. No self-respecting developer pays for software. The average start-up or corporate developer doesn’t want to buy any software. Nor do they have to, because there are great open-source projects that do the same things that proprietary products do.
We distribute three to four million copies of OpenOffice every week, and probably have 100 million users worldwide. The bulk of these users are students, retirees, etc. I didn’t have access to these through an enterprise direct sales force. The only way to reach them was through free distribution over the Net.

Most don’t care about the license–they care about the money they’re not spending. (Think about how bizarre Google’s model would be if they charge 10 cents for every search.) But those students and free users of today are the corporate buyers of tomorrow.’’

CONTINUENT aimed at an offensive and defensive move.

Offensive in terms expanding market reach, defensive in term of taking control of open source project which could have become a competitive thread if let develop freely on its own. Continuent used to have proprietary clustering for open source (m/cluster classic for MySQL). They acquired rights for Sequoia open source project (www.continuent.org), formerly know as C-JDBC on Object Web) speeding up the project development as well as making it more manageable from business perspective by dedicating some in-house resources and that enabled them to expand product offering beyond MySQL, initially including also PostgreSQL and then subsequently added also support for commercial databases (Oracle, SQL Server, Sybase, DB2).

As a part of this process they opened or kept open some 90% of the code base and then create commercial value-add layer based on knowledge on specific databases.

And some results:

SUN according to Schwartz: ‘’In a year where Sun arguably moved more aggressively to give away more free software than any other company, we grew our software business by 13 percent. It was the fastest-growing business at Sun (and doesn’t even include Solaris, which we don’t yet break out). We pumped out more software last year than we have in the history of the company. We gave it away. And yet our software business grew by 13 percent.

How?

If you’re a London developer that happens to work for a bank, maybe you have your laptop set up with Ubuntu. It’s perfect for you, and it’s free as in beer. But if you’re the CIO at that same company, you’re going to demand a support contract for Ubuntu (or Solaris) running on your mission-critical servers, because you don’t want the risk of systems going down without backup.

I don’t expect many college students, developers, or start-ups to spend a lot of money on intellectual property. I expect someone whose job is on the line if a system fails to spend considerably more than nothing. The key is figuring out the difference between one’s market and one’s community. They are not the same.'’

Continuent with open source solution, according to the CEO Eero Teerikorpi, the approach has enabled us to move into subscription pricing and allowed us to significantly increase the services sale revenue. The marketing cost has definitely come down, but the sales cost has also come down, although that is expected to go back normal level when we move from early adopters to normal sales cycles.

For further insights I encourage you to look into the materials we published in the OSSI-project (available for free as pdf-downloads)

Disclaimer: Sun has funded some of my research and Continuent is a client of mine

Part 2/2 of this post will include some key things to consider when going open such as:

- Core vs. context
- Viral vs. non-viral licenses
- Importance of managing rights
- Conversion rate vs. natural ratio of customers vs. community users

Julkaistu 14:40  /  Kommentoi

16.11.2007

12.10.2007

Mitä olisi internetin ja avoimen lähdekoodin tulevaisuus ilman Suomea?

- Mikko Puhakka

‘’Markkinat ovat verkossa, tuotantovoima toimii verkossa, molemmat globaalisti kaikkien ulottuvilla’’ Mårten Mickos, MySQL toimitusjohtaja.

Tehdäänpä pieni älyllinen harjoitus: Web 2.0 palvelut eli uuden sukupolven internet-yhtiöiden hankkeet, kuten Sulake (Habbo Hotel), Facebook ja MySpace rakentuvat pääsääntöisesti ns. LAMP-alustan päälle. Toisin sanoen ne rakentuvat kokonaisuuden päälle, joka koostuu Linuxista, Apachesta, MySQL:sta ja PHP:sta - valikoimasta avoimen lähdekoodin ohjelmistoja.

Uudet hankkeet eroavat merkittävästi ensimmäisen sukupolven internet-hankkeista siinä, että ne ovat onnistuneet synnyttämään merkittävää liiketoimintaa hyvin nopeasti. Ne ovat saavuttaneet jopa satojen miljoonien eurojen liikevaihdon muutamassa vuodessa.

Toinen erottava tekijä on se, että avoimen lähdekoodin käyttö on mahdollistanut äärimmäisen kustannustehokkaan tavan testata uusia ajatuksia ja toimintamalleja. Jos homma ei toimi, kokeillaan välittömästi muuta. Eli päinvastoin kuin aikaisemmin, jolloin rakennettiin koko vuoden ajan liiketoimintasuunnitelmaa.

Puolet rakennuspalikoista suomalaisia

Linux (Linus Torvalds) ja MySQL (Monty Widenius) ovat suomalaislähtöisiä hankkeita. Eli jopa puolet keskeisistä uuden sukupolven internetin rakennuspalikoista ovat suomalaissyntyisiä. Ottaen huomioon maamme aseman software-teknologiakartalla ja väkilukumme, tämä on suorastaan hämmentävää.

Mutta ei Suomen ja suomalaisten ansiot vielä tähän lopu. Kerroin edellä mainitun havaintoni kollegalleni Tere Vadenille. Hän muistutti, että avoimen lähdekoodin kehityshankkeiden keskustelut käydään käytännössä 100-prosenttisesti IRC:n (Internet Relay Chat) ryhmissä. Ja mistäpä muualta IRC onkaan lähtenyt liikkeelle kuin Suomesta. Oululainen Jarkko Oikarinen kehitti järjestelmän vuonna 1988.

Kiinan ja muiden nousevien markkina-alueiden avoimen lähdekoodiin, erityisesti Linuxiin liittyvät hankkeet ovat viime aikoina olleet viljalti otsikoissa. Miten Linux löysi tiensä Kiinaan? Se kävi niin, että Teknillisen Korkeakoulun jatko-opiskelija Tohtori Gong Min palatessaan Kiinaan vuonna 1996 pakkasi parikymmentä sen hetkisen Linux-version sisältävää diskettiä mukaansa. Jo seuraavana vuonna Kiinassa käynnistyi ensimmäinen Linux-jakelu.

Uusi, korkeampi ambitiotaso on tarpeen

Nyt kun pääomasijoittajillekin on todistettu, että avoimen lähdekoodin ympärille voi synnyttää merkittävää liiketoimintaa - ja että niistä voi irtautua kannattavasti kuten Sleepycatin, Trolltechin JBOSSin ja Xensourcen tapauksissa - olisi aika miettiä seuraavia askeleita. Askeleita, joissa esimerkiksi innovaatio- ja open source -maailman mekanismien yhdistämisellä valjastaisimme valtavan kansainvälisen osaamisverkoston täysin poikkeavalla tavalla. Sellainen voisi olla uuden tyyppinen alkuvaiheen investointi-instrumentti, joka aktiivisella ”open innovation” -ohjauksella loisi uutta arvoa. Samalla se toimisi teollisuutta ja tiedeyhteisöjä palvelevana verkostona.

Tämän kaltainen uusi ja korkeampi ambitiotaso on tarpeen. Muuten suomalainen ja etenkin riskirahoitteinen innovaatiotoiminta käpertyy riittämättömien koti- ja lähimarkkinoiden varaan eikä turvaa tulevaisuuden kilpailukykyämme. Uuden instrumentin toteuttamiseen on Suomella kaikki edellytykset - etenkin kun meidät mielletään kaikkialla maailmassa avoimien ympäristöjen edelläkävijöiksi.

Merkittävät mahdollisuudet käytettävä

Avoimen lähdekoodin tuoma murros on varmasti yksi suurimpia muutoksia, mitä ohjelmisto- ja ohjelmistoperustaisessa liiketoiminnassa on tapahtunut vuosikymmeniin. Murros ei toki rajoitu pelkästään avoimeen lähdekoodiin, vaan kasvavassa määrin myös avoimeen sisältöön, avoimeen dataan ja avoimeen substanssiin.

Historiamme perusteella uskallan väittää, että meillä on jälleen seuraavien vuosien aikana merkittävä mahdollisuus edessämme avoimen lähdekoodin alueella. Kansainväliset ovet ovat meille auki, kuten silloin, kun Nokia loi meille maineen mobiilipuolella – mahdollisuutta ei saa jättää käyttämättä!

**kolumni on julkaistu alunperin osana Kauppalehden Avopaikka liitettä 2.10.2007 koko liitteen löydät osoitteesta: http://www.coss.fi/web/coss/avopaikka

Julkaistu 16:05  /  6 vastausta

10.10.2007

100 parasta OSS ohjelmistoa Macille

- Mikko Puhakka

Ennen kuin näin listan, en tiennytkään mitä kaikkea macistäni puuttui;)

linkit löytyy täältä.

Julkaistu 14:20  /  Kommentoi

2.10.2007

Avoimin Mielin Tampereella 1.10-3.10

- Mikko Puhakka

Ensi tiistaina (tai oikeastaan tutkijoiden osalta jo maanantaina) Open Source ihmiset kokoontuvat jälleen Tampereelle Open Mind tilaisuuteen (www.openmind.fi). Akateemikot vaihtavat ajatuksia maanantaina, tekniikasta kiinnostuneet tiistaina ja bisneksestä innostuneet keskiviikkona.
Itse tulen olemaan paikalla koko viikon ja siinä missä ohjelma on mielenkiintoinen, niin kiintoisampaa itselleni tulee olemaan mikä on ‘’käytävä’’ keskustelujen sisältö tänä vuonna, niistä saan vuosi vuodelta eri tapahtumissa enemmän irti kuin itse esityksistä, ja monesti keskusteluyhteydet jatkuvat online tilassa hyvinkin hedelmällisinä kun on kertalleen saatu alku ja nähty kasvokkain vaikkapa oluttuopin ääressä.
Mutta mistä tänä vuonna puhutaan käytävillä?

Oma veikkaukseni kärki 3sta:

1) Microsoft & OS
2) GPLv3
3) Liiketoimintamallit

Laittakaa viestiä mikko.puhakka@gmail.com, tekstiviesti 0500200200 mikäli haluatte tavata tilaisuuden aikana, tai tulkaa vain nykäisemään hihasta.

Julkaistu 13:46  /  2 vastausta

28.8.2007

Avoimuuden Nimissä

- Mikko Puhakka

Avoimuuden nimissä lienee parasta kertoa että, olen eilisestä lähtien aloittanut espanjalaisen Ebox nimisen open source yrityksen hallituksessa (Spin-off Warp yhtiöstä). Pyrin kuitenkin kommentoimaan mahdollisissa jutuissa yhtiötä mahdollisimman objektiivisesti.

Olen monestakin syystä innoissani tästä uudesta haasteesta, sillä siinä missä uskon pystyväni tuomaan yhtiölle lisäarvoa, pääsen myös ensikädessä kokemaan ja seuraamaan läheltä miten uusi open source yhtiö rakennetaan, vielä aika tuoreen kehittäjä yhteisön ympärille.

Lähikuukausien haasteet ovat monenlaisia: riittävän rahoituksen varmistaminen, tunnettavuuden lisääminen, oikeanlaisen ansaintalogiikan löytäminen jne.

Samaan aikaan hallitukseen tulivat Stephen Walli , tunnettu open source asiantuntija USAsta sekä Timo Teimonen, Nokia Venturesin entinen vetäjä.

Pyrin säännöllisin väliajoin kertomaan myös tämän blogin välityksellä miten edistymme ja miten eri haasteita ratkotaan.

Tiedote uudesta hallituksesta ja lisätietoa yrityksestä, niin englanniksi kuin espanjaksikin löytyy yhtiön perustajan ja toimitusjohtajan Ignacio Correaksen blogista täältä.

Julkaistu 21:45  /  Kommentoi

27.8.2007

Part II Emergence of Open Source within Chinese Software Industry

- Mikko Puhakka

There has been quite a bit of talk about emergence of Open Source in China, but the numbers are still very small, as they are for the overall software industry, highlighted by the numbers with Linux (smaller yet for other OSS).

‘’Linux has been riding on a wave in China, topping the growth of all operating systems in the first quarter of 2007, says an industry analyst.

According to CCID Consulting, which specializes in China research, Linux sales posted a 30.9 percent year-on-year growth to reach 31 million yuan (US$4 million). Windows and Unix growth rates were 11.6 percent and 9.6 percent, respectively.’’

‘’Q1 market share Linux (2.5 percent), Windows (41.8 percent), Unix (53.9 percent)’’

More in a ZDNet Asia article

Some key issues to consider in my view are:

1) Microsoft still has huge resources that enable them to have their way in most markets, including China if allowed
2) The power of Linux and OSS in general lies in mobilizing huge numbers of volunteers as developers, as evangelists, as testers etc that are hard to match by traditional software makers and vendors
3) So far this formation of large enough communities has not taken place in China, so the vendors of Linux and OS software have to compete on Microsoft’s terms and other software providers terms, without the benefit of an active community, and that is just too tough, hopefully this is about to change

But to continue with the questions I started with JingJing in the first part of this series Part 1 here is further Q&A

Q1 Name some key milestones in Chinese Open Source history

(translation of the key Chinese open source history, Source )

The origin of the Chinese open source activities can be dated back in the beginning of 1990s, when Dr. Gong Ming was working on his PhD research topic on parallel processing in Helsinki University of Technology in Finland. He discovered Linux operating system from an educational network in 1991 and later on started deployment and development on it. The major movement related to China when:

- in 1996, Dr. Gong Min brought the Linux operating system within 20 discs back to China.
- The first Chinese Linux server was set up on 5.5.1997 in Chang Zhou, Jiang Su Province. Its domain name is cLinux.ml.org
- The first Chinese Linux user group is established in Shanghai
- China Software Association Free Software R&D Branch was established in Beijing in 17.6.1997. The biggest Chinese free source download site was built under the domain “free.cei.gov.cn”
- “Linux and Chinese Software Industry” Discussion Forum was organized by the Chinese Information Industry Ministry in July 1999. This is the first action to support Linux from the Chinese government.
- On 7.3.2000, the first Chinese Linux company - Blue Point went for IPO in US. Its stock price rise up more than 400%, counting for $0.4 billion.
- In June 2000, Beijing Red Flag Software Co. Ltd was established.
- In Feb 2002, China Software Association Co-Create Software Branch established in Beijing.
- On 24.6.2000, the Chinese government issued the first policy to promote and encourage the development of Chinese software and integrated circuits - “Some policy to encourage the development of software and IC industry”, also called “No. 18 Document”.
- In December 2002, the Ministry of Information Industry and Science and Technology together organized “Linux Software and Application Promotion Discussion Forum”. This is a signal from the Chinese government to support the Linux software development
- “Open Source Software Development Summit in China” was held by China Software Association Co-Create Software Branch together with other government offices on 23.9.2003
- On 3.4.2004, China, South Korea and Japan together held “OSS Seminar”
- on 22.7.2004, China OSS Promotion Union was eatablished. This is the first open source organization in China.
- On 28.2.2005, the “Chinese Open Source Week” was first held in Beijing. This is the first Asian-wide huge open source event held by China.
- on 5.3.2005, Mozilla China announced its settlement in China
- on 10.5.2005, China Linux Industry Strategic alliance was established in Beijing. It was initiated by CSIP (Ministry of Information Industry Software and Integrated Circuits Promotion Center)
- on 30.11.2005, “IP China 2005: Open Source Software and IPR Annual Meeting” was held in Beijing
- on 29.8.2006, MySQL and a Chinese open source company “GreatLinux” announced a strategic partnership to deliver commercial MySQL-based solutions to the burgeoning Chinese market.

Q2 What are some key efforts around Open Source right now?

The Chinese government has been putting lots of effort in encouraging open source development. Policies like “No. 18 Document” and “No. 47 Document” were issued for promoting open source. They not only contain the government good wish, but also practical support like from taxation, finance, purchase, import and export…

Linux development started since the beginning of 2000, and comprises a huge part of open source development in China. When people talk about open source nowadays, many people will right away associate the discussion to Linux. Based on CCW Research, Linux software market sales reached 570 million Yuan in 2003, and 750 million in 2004 with 32% growth. Amongst which, the server-side product sales was 623.2 million Yuan, and desktop sales – 126.8 million Yuan. Till 2005, the top three players in the market are TurboLinux[1], Red Flag Software[2], and China Standard Software[3].

Though the Linux development has been around 30% increase within the recent years, still the utilization rate is rather low. Besides the known usability issue, one of the root problems is software piracy. Microsoft got 95% of the market in the Chinese market thanks to that since the mid 1990s. And it is hard for Linux to make its entry as the market is already dominated by Microsoft. Even Bill Gates said that “It’s easier for our software to compete with Linux when there’s piracy than when there’s not”. On the other hand, the competition in the Linux market is becoming fierce. Microsoft started offering $3 Windows XP to developing countries’ governments and educations. Chinese Linux vendors are currently focusing on government and small to medium sized enterprise market. In order to gain market shares, the market research suggested industry cooperation and business acquisition to be a business strategy to carry out for the domestic Linux vendors.

After year 2004, the concept of open source got wider spread in China. This also thanks to the many successful commercializations of open source software globally. However, understanding of open source is still relatively fresh in China. in many cases, it could be incorrect, subjective or incomplete. However, as open source is a new development direction in the software industry, many open source companies received venture capital investment and started their development. Most of them are trying to copying the existing business models from the west. However revenue generation still remains a reluctant topic for them to discuss. There are a few successful example only. One is Discuz, a Chinese open source discussion platform. Currently there are over 30,000 discussion forums using its product all over the world. Otherwise companies like Hoodong, Huihoo have also been relatively successful in its development. IT people in China do realize the benefits of open source, yet the Chinese market is special and immature, finding out the right path for commercialization may take still several years.

Foreign companies have been looking into the Chinese market for new opportunities. Companies like MySQL, RedHat, Mozilla, Novell, Oracle, Ubuntu, etc have all been establishing business in China.

[1] TurboLinux is an open source software company focusing on offering enterprise software solutions, and support service based on Linux. It is founded in the US in the early 1990s and entered the Chinese market in 1999. www.turbolinux.com.cn
[2] RedFlag Software is the biggest and most well-known Chinese Linux vendor. http://www.redflag-linux.com/
[3] China Standard Software is located in Shanghai. Its main products and services includes Linux desktop, Linux server, office suits and security software. http://www.cs2c.com.cn

Q3. What are your key thoughts on the state of the China’s Open Source a) today, and b) how does the future look?

The Chinese open source is still very young nowadays, and this situation will not change rapidly. There are many reasons behind:
1) The software piracy made Microsoft Windows the dominant operating system with 95% of the whole operating system market. The user base for open source is thus really small, not mentioning the open source development.
2) The Chinese legal system for open source IPR is non-existing.
3) The understanding of open source is still very vague and incomplete. One reason is that free source was first translated into Chinese as “free of charge” software… thus also affect the understanding of open source.
4) The Chinese open source community has just been started. It is young and in great need of serious development.

Despite of the problem mentioned above, I see a very promising Chinese market for open source. According to our Chinese philosophy, in order to win or succeed, time, location and people are the 3 key factors; however the most important among these three is people. At the moment, the time has come for the open source to expand in China. The huge Chinese market is attractive; thus the location is not bad for open source. However the Chinese market is lacking huge number of open source professionals. And this situation cannot be changed easily without serious effort. In order to succeed in the Chinese market, raising up a huge open source audience by introducing the open source concepts, business models, legal issues, community management as well as technical knowledge is essential.

In addition, the Chinese market is fulled with varieties and dimensions. Open source comparing to proprietary software has the advantage on pricing. Based on the current Chinese market, there are a lot of potentials in all industries to compete with proprietary software, especially in the small, medium sized enterprise market, the education sector, regions and provinces under average development.

Julkaistu 08:46  /  Kommentoi

12.8.2007

RSS

Haku

Uusimmat kommentit

  • J: Loistavaa että löysit tämän netistä, itse Pekingin konferenssissa jäi se kirjanen saamatta :)
  • MattiK: Tiedoksesi seuraavaa: "Suomen kielen lautakunta päätyi kokouksessaan 12.3.2007 siihen, että molemmat...
  • intternettipoliisi: Luulisi että open source blogissa osattaisiin kirjoittaa sana "Internet" isolla alku kirjaimella...
  • Mikko Puhakka: Ainakin vielä kesällä oli MySQL käyttäjä http://www.mysql.com/customers /customer.php?id=268
  • KeijoK: eiks habbo käytä oraclea?

Äskettäin kirjoitettua

Arkisto

Missä olemme ja mihin olemme menossa Linus Torvaldsin viitoittamalla tiellä Open Source maailmassa? Tämä blogi pyrkii tuomaan esille tärkeitä asioita tämän murroksen keskellä pyrkien lisäämään tietoisuutta niin avoimen tulevaisuuden mahdollisuuksista kuin haasteista.


   
digitoday.fi, Töölönlahdenkatu 2, 00089 Sanomat.
Puhelin +358 9 1221, faksi +358 9 122 4179
Päätoimittaja: Juhani Pekkala, toimituspäällikkö Mari Flink
Myynti: verkkomedia.myynti@sanoma.fi, +358 9 122 2863.
Sähköposti: toimitus@digitoday.fi
Copyright 2006 Taloussanomat Oy.
Our Privacy Policy

Julkaisujärjestelmä